Which statement correctly describes the rule about intentional contact?

Which statement correctly describes the rule about intentional contact?

• A. Any contact is allowed if not flagged by a referee.
• B. Intentional contact is permitted during timeouts.
• C. Intentional contact is not allowed; play should be non-contact.
• D. Intentional contact is required to break a stall.

Answer: (C)

Ultimate Frisbee is a non-contact sport, so players are expected to avoid intentional contact with opponents. This keeps play safe and fair and gives everyone a reasonable chance to compete for the disc. When someone makes intentional contact, it’s treated as a foul and play is reset or possession is adjusted according to the rules. Incidental contact can happen as players maneuver for the disc, but deliberate interference is not permitted. The other statements imply situations where contact would be allowed or used to gain an advantage (during timeouts, to break a stall, etc.), which contradicts the non-contact principle. Therefore, the idea that intentional contact is not allowed and play should be non-contact best expresses the rule.

Ultimate Frisbee is a non-contact sport, so players are expected to avoid intentional contact with opponents. This keeps play safe and fair and gives everyone a reasonable chance to compete for the disc. When someone makes intentional contact, it’s treated as a foul and play is reset or possession is adjusted according to the rules. Incidental contact can happen as players maneuver for the disc, but deliberate interference is not permitted. The other statements imply situations where contact would be allowed or used to gain an advantage (during timeouts, to break a stall, etc.), which contradicts the non-contact principle. Therefore, the idea that intentional contact is not allowed and play should be non-contact best expresses the rule.